IPCC and East Anglian U. fake data, so why do they need to fake the data if GW is real?

They obviously faked it and it is pathetic that some can't read the simple English of their own writing. It was obvious before the emails that they falsified the data or intentionally distorted the science because they rewrote the known history which was their obvious agenda. They had to revise history because their silly irrational doomsday fantasy doesn't stand up to common sense unless they falsify the data. They did that with completely bogus tree ring data when they knew for a fact that they didn't match the temperature record. That is why they cherry picked data for different parts of their record. Then they falsified data by smoothing it so their manipulation wouldn't show. Apparently their dog ate the raw data so no one could call them on their obviously lies. More recently they, the ones who call us fools, reduced the reporting station from over 6000 to about 1000 and there was a sudden warming produced by cherry picking data. Then they use algorithms that convert the non warming raw data into what alarmists ignorantly call warming. They reinvent science and imagine positive feedbacks and tipping points when it is blatantly obvious from the climate record that negative feedback exists. Anything that someone can conceive of that might be negative is believed as gospel by alarmists because it supports their doomsday cult and anti-capitalist mentality.